Are you part ape or full human? The evolutionist scientists think that you have a monkey of an ancestor. Are they making monkeys out of themselves? 
The Evolutionists and Creationists both say that we came from a common ancestor. Beyond that the similarities end. Creationists say that people were created with a marvelous plan by God. Evolutionists say that man came from apes through a long series of evolving from tiny life forms to our current form.

   Over hundreds of millions of years the creatures had a little problem here and there and so over thousands of years evolved something to fix it and through evolving a little every couple thousand years finally nature would produce something totally different.  Now with all this evolving over millions of years there should be millions, no billions of these transitional forms. There should be about two transitional fossils for every regular fossil. But, there is one problem with this. There has not been one undisputed transitional form found. Even the disputed transitional forms are rare.  There should be transitional forms for every creature that is or has been alive at some point allowing for more because of evolving. But there are none! Darwin himself said that a lack of fossil evidence of transitional forms would reduce him to an embarrassing footnote in history.  Darwin also said, “Why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory.” (C.R. Darwin, Origin of Species, 6th edition, 1872 (London: John Murray, 1902), p. 413.)

    If that is true then Darwin should be “reduced to an embarrassing footnote”. Read what one Evolutionist said, “I fully agree with your comments about the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them … . I will lay it on the line-there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.” (C. Patterson, letter to Luther D. Sunderland, 10 April 1979, as published in Darwin’s Enigma (Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 4th ed. 1988), p. 89.) 

   The bottom line is that there is no real and undisputed transitional forms out there. When I say no undisputed transitional forms, I mean that there are none that are undisputed among the evolutionists themselves.
Continued on the next page.